From: "Luís Henriques" <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <k.khlebnikov@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH < v3.10] ipc/msg: fix race around refcount
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:09:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140331090908.GC5042@hercules> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140326101218.11221.74072.stgit@buzz>
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 02:12:19PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> In older kernels (before v3.10) ipc_rcu_hdr->refcount was non-atomic int.
> There was possuble double-free bug: do_msgsnd() calls ipc_rcu_putref() under
> msq->q_perm->lock and RCU, while freequeue() calls it while it holds only
> 'rw_mutex', so there is no sinchronization between them. Two function
> decrements '2' non-atomically, they both can get '0' as result.
>
> do_msgsnd() freequeue()
>
> msq = msg_lock_check(ns, msqid);
> ...
> ipc_rcu_getref(msq);
> msg_unlock(msq);
> schedule();
> (caller locks spinlock)
> expunge_all(msq, -EIDRM);
> ss_wakeup(&msq->q_senders, 1);
> msg_rmid(ns, msq);
> msg_unlock(msq);
> ipc_lock_by_ptr(&msq->q_perm);
> ipc_rcu_putref(msq); ipc_rcu_putref(msq);
> < both may get get --(...)->refcount == 0 >
>
> This patch locks ipc_lock and RCU around ipc_rcu_putref in freequeue.
> ( RCU protects memory for spin_unlock() )
>
> Similar bugs might be in other users of ipc_rcu_putref().
>
> In the mainline this has been fixed in v3.10 indirectly in commmit
> 6062a8dc0517bce23e3c2f7d2fea5e22411269a3
> ("ipc,sem: fine grained locking for semtimedop") by Rik van Riel.
> That commit optimized locking and converted refcount into atomic.
>
> I'm not sure that anybody should care about this bug: it's very-very unlikely
> and no longer exists in actual mainline. I've found this just by looking into
> the code, probably this never happens in real life.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <k.khlebnikov@samsung.com>
Thank you, I'm queuing this for the 3.5 kernel.
Cheers,
--
Lu�s
> ---
> ipc/msg.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/ipc/msg.c b/ipc/msg.c
> index 7385de2..25f1a61 100644
> --- a/ipc/msg.c
> +++ b/ipc/msg.c
> @@ -296,7 +296,9 @@ static void freeque(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp)
> }
> atomic_sub(msq->q_cbytes, &ns->msg_bytes);
> security_msg_queue_free(msq);
> + ipc_lock_by_ptr(&msq->q_perm);
> ipc_rcu_putref(msq);
> + ipc_unlock(&msq->q_perm);
> }
>
> /*
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-31 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-26 10:12 [PATCH < v3.10] ipc/msg: fix race around refcount Konstantin Khlebnikov
2014-03-31 9:09 ` Luís Henriques [this message]
2014-04-06 13:00 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140331090908.GC5042@hercules \
--to=luis.henriques@canonical.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=k.khlebnikov@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).