stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: mq flush: fix race between IPI handler and mq flush worker
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 17:23:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140520152303.GA20352@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVNprzhEpXGKze=A4T2b-y35vXRxRTOUqpywu+Et=t37Kw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:20:25AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> - the conflict on the two structures just happens with flush
> requests because rq->requeue_work is only used to queue
> flush requests

Once we get non-trivial block drivers we'll need to be able
to requeue arbitrary requests, that's why I added blk_mq_requeue_request.
The scsi-mq work that I plant to submit for the next merge window is
the prime example.

I'd really prefer to avoid breaking that use case if we can avoid it.


Note that the flush code already is very nasy for blk-mq and this just
makes it worse.

One fix that would also help to sort out some of the flush issues would
be to add a list of requests that need requeueing to the blk_mq context,
which we can add requeusts to from irq context.  The next time we run
hw contexts for the queue we'll pick them up in user context and insert
them.


  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-20 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-19 15:05 [PATCH] block: mq flush: fix race between IPI handler and mq flush worker Ming Lei
2014-05-19 15:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-19 15:34   ` Ming Lei
2014-05-20  3:20   ` Ming Lei
2014-05-20 15:23     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2014-05-21  5:16       ` Ming Lei
2014-05-21  5:36         ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-21  6:48           ` Ming Lei
2014-05-27 18:13             ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-27 18:38               ` Jens Axboe
2014-05-27 18:53                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-27 18:54                   ` Jens Axboe
2014-05-27 19:15                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-27 19:17                       ` Jens Axboe
2014-05-27 19:21                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-27 19:35                           ` Jens Axboe
2014-05-28  1:34                             ` Ming Lei
2014-05-28  2:26                               ` Jens Axboe
2014-05-28  2:31                                 ` Jens Axboe
2014-05-28  5:22                                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-28 14:08                                     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140520152303.GA20352@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).