From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 14:07:08 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com, shuah.kh@samsung.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.14 000/140] 3.14.5-stable review Message-ID: <20140529210708.GA26023@roeck-us.net> References: <20140529043049.661315084@linuxfoundation.org> <53874CE2.2010701@roeck-us.net> <20140529182109.GA10142@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140529182109.GA10142@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:21:09AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 08:06:10AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 05/28/2014 09:32 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.14.5 release. > > >There are 140 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > >let me know. > > > > > >Responses should be made by Sat May 31 04:30:12 UTC 2014. > > >Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > Build results: > > total: 143 pass: 133 skipped: 4 fail: 6 > > > > Qemu tests all passed. > > > > Failing builds are > > > > alpha:defconfig - Fails with 'Inconsistent kallsyms data'. New failure; need to debug. > > unicore32:defconfig - still fails to build for all releases > > powerpc:allmodconfig - fail for binutils 2.3 and 2.4. known problem; patch pending > > powerpc:ppc64e_defconfig - fail if built with binutils 2.4; patch pending > > powerpc:chroma_defconfig - fail if built with binutils 2.4; patch pending > > > > Bisect points to commit 'vlan: Fix lockdep warning with stacked vlan devices' as culprit > > for the alpha:defconfig build failure. Reverting this patch fixes the problem. > > I looked at the patch, but I have no idea what may cause the failure. > > Odd. Is this also broken in Linus's tree? > Agreed, it is odd. As I said, not idea what is causing this. v3.15-rc7 is fine. Guenter