From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 11:01:51 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com, shuah.kh@samsung.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.4 000/214] 3.4.92-stable review Message-ID: <20140605180151.GB4121@kroah.com> References: <20140605041639.638675216@linuxfoundation.org> <20140605171202.GA725@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140605171202.GA725@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 10:12:02AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:16:03PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.92 release. > > There are 214 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sat Jun 7 04:15:47 UTC 2014. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > Build results: > total: 136 pass: 109 skipped: 20 fail: 7 > > Qemu tests all passed. > > Results are as expected. > Details are available at server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. > > I see there is an update coming to fix one of the patches; I also see > that there is a second patch with potential problems, so maybe there will > be another update. I'll monitor and report if there are differences in > test results. Thanks, that would be appreciated. greg k-h