Re: [GIT PULL] bcache changes for 3.17

[Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>]

On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 17:03:57 +0000
Arne Wiebalck <Arne.Wiebalck@cern.ch> wrote:

> 
> On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser <peter@kieser.ca>
>  wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> >> On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>> (from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3,
> >>> going all the way back to 3.10 would be a lot of work. If there's
> >>> anyone that cares about bcache on stable kernels (and actually
> >>> use it), now would be a good time to pipe up.
> >> 
> >> Just "piping up" as I care about bcache and actually use it in
> >> production on 3.10! Shame I don't have the knowledge to try and
> >> backport these though :-)
> >> 
> >> Eddie
> > 
> > I'm "piping up" as well, I use bcache on 3.10 in production.
> > 
> > -Peter
> > 
> 
> 
> More "piping up": we currently use bcache on a few nodes in
> production, on 3.14 and 3.15, and plan to roll it out on a wider
> scale now. If necessary we'll go with these kernels, but we'd
> certainly prefer our usual 3.10-based CentOS kernel.
> 

CentOS does not ship bcache at all. In retrospect it's obvious why.