From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 19:33:54 -0500 From: Chuck Ebbert To: Arne Wiebalck Cc: Peter Kieser , "eddie@ehuk.net" , "Jens Axboe" , Francis Moreau , "Kent Overstreet" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org" , stable Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcache changes for 3.17 Message-ID: <20140905193354.4a123a4c@as> In-Reply-To: References: <20140805043346.GF541@moria.home.lan> <53E10D48.1010700@kernel.dk> <53E7251B.3080305@kieser.ca> <540966BA.9030106@gmail.com> <5409C5FC.6020406@kernel.dk> <5409D8BC.7030003@ehuk.net> <5409E7AB.7040704@kieser.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 17:03:57 +0000 Arne Wiebalck wrote: > > On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser > wrote: > > > > > On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote: > >> On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote: > >>> (from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3, > >>> going all the way back to 3.10 would be a lot of work. If there's > >>> anyone that cares about bcache on stable kernels (and actually > >>> use it), now would be a good time to pipe up. > >> > >> Just "piping up" as I care about bcache and actually use it in > >> production on 3.10! Shame I don't have the knowledge to try and > >> backport these though :-) > >> > >> Eddie > > > > I'm "piping up" as well, I use bcache on 3.10 in production. > > > > -Peter > > > > > More "piping up": we currently use bcache on a few nodes in > production, on 3.14 and 3.15, and plan to roll it out on a wider > scale now. If necessary we'll go with these kernels, but we'd > certainly prefer our usual 3.10-based CentOS kernel. > CentOS does not ship bcache at all. In retrospect it's obvious why.