From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:45:36 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Jiri Slaby Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com, shuah.kh@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/142] 3.12.29-stable review Message-ID: <20140926154536.GA7174@roeck-us.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.29 release. > There are 142 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Tue Sep 30 11:45:24 CEST 2014. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Hi Jiri, Build results: total: 135 pass: 135 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 21 pass: 21 fail: 0 Both obviously look good, however my tree doesn't match your review request. It includes 245 patches instead of just 142. Looks like your tree is a bit ahead of time, so I guess that is ok. Is there a way for me to avoid this when pulling in your pending changes ? So far I pull the changes from the stable-3.12-queue branch in your repository at kernel.org. Thanks, Guenter