From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 13:45:03 +0200 From: William Dauchy To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: William Dauchy , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net, satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com, shuah.kh@samsung.com, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/96] 3.12.30-stable review Message-ID: <20141010114503.GC1681@gandi.net> References: <20141010114047.GB32429@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/e2eDi0V/xtL+Mc8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141010114047.GB32429@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --/e2eDi0V/xtL+Mc8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Oct10 04:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > The last 3.14.x release had a bunch of these patches already in them, > with more to come in future releases, so yes, 3.14.x is going to benefit > from it, and you didn't even notice :) oh true; did not catch the last one. > But 3.10 will probably not, it's been just too long for that kernel > release, sorry, major mm changes like this isn't something I'm willing > to do at this point in time. understood. Thanks for your quick answer, --=20 William --/e2eDi0V/xtL+Mc8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlQ3xr8ACgkQ1I6eqOUidQH61wCaA2R0wGXgO1AjBzVcUFspuSzs hfIAn0v1PzZb3xbkKOZtswEBVMo4tqjT =8QTT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/e2eDi0V/xtL+Mc8--