From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Christian Borntraeger , Cornelia Huck , David Hildenbrand Subject: [PATCH 3.18 065/150] KVM: s390: flush CPU on load control Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:22:16 -0800 Message-Id: <20150114072058.788565805@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20150114072055.842408181@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20150114072055.842408181@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Christian Borntraeger commit 2dca485f8740208604543c3960be31a5dd3ea603 upstream. some control register changes will flush some aspects of the CPU, e.g. POP explicitely mentions that for CR9-CR11 "TLBs may be cleared". Instead of trying to be clever and only flush on specific CRs, let play safe and flush on all lctl(g) as future machines might define new bits in CRs. Load control intercept should not happen that often. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger Acked-by: Cornelia Huck Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c @@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_lctl(struct kvm_vcpu break; reg = (reg + 1) % 16; } while (1); - + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH, vcpu); return 0; } @@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ static int handle_lctlg(struct kvm_vcpu break; reg = (reg + 1) % 16; } while (1); - + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH, vcpu); return 0; }