From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:01:49 -0700 From: Mark Brown To: Ian Abbott Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20150323210149.GR14954@sirena.org.uk> References: <1427133027-8134-1-git-send-email-abbotti@mev.co.uk> <20150323185042.GL14954@sirena.org.uk> <5510698B.3040000@mev.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XAEV7zm15O60d1Zf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5510698B.3040000@mev.co.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev: fix possible arithmetic overflow for multi-transfer message Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --XAEV7zm15O60d1Zf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 07:29:15PM +0000, Ian Abbott wrote: > On 23/03/15 18:50, Mark Brown wrote: > >This doesn't apply against Linus' tree as far as I can tell - if you > >think this needs to go to stable please send a version that applies > >against that. > Sorry about that. It applies to linux-next and might apply against 4.1, > depending on the timing. v4.1 is linux-next at this point... > Can you strip the Cc line or do you want me to repost the patch? I've applied it, but like I say it won't go to stable. --XAEV7zm15O60d1Zf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVEH81AAoJECTWi3JdVIfQZWYH/iF1DvxHCZXeHYfC55l6mGfr 2MZOrJQCMnwIS2nrc/Qij8ceUDXwUsmLlXWRp+NIRXSoG/rXpm6TWtYhKxk6eMZk 4XISRmCSN9Gc1emP+jxiXd8upYIggAMVrwVrde/9rvDJBwDEnQqT3EI8q1kgvPMq IBcxLES42bmXAltyEu7O/FVWcsymiZKt3qF7NQNcupl+3nq6SZUI//poMQxC7Z3s JWiCEfS/zKehw2+6uQjzJd8Cn4DequX3Eg0K6ylEP7YEmyCoxxBgeW9amvbF8zl4 T68lKOCWb0LYZPNPd0ra0JJNEtHaoXv2wS2D3tw4dZnVKESI3bbc7xDe91OktJg= =/z4e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XAEV7zm15O60d1Zf--