From: Michael Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
"Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
"Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard" <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: "Jonas Andersson" <jonas@microbit.se>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: pll: fix input range validity check
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 21:37:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150413043725.19585.5717@quantum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427594023-9697-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Quoting Boris Brezillon (2015-03-28 18:53:43)
> The PLL impose a certain input range to work correctly, but it appears that
> this input range does not apply on the input clock (or parent clock) but
> on the input clock after it has passed the PLL divisor.
> Fix the implementation accordingly.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.14+
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> Reported-by: Jonas Andersson <jonas@microbit.se>
Hi Boris,
OK, so this patch along with your two previous submissions kind of
tackle some of items I mentioned earlier today[0].
Does this patch, combined with your two prior patches[1][2] resolve the
issue you brought up in your "Propagating clock rate constraints"
thread[3]?
[0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<20150412235021.19585.27431@quantum>
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1427593728-9366-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
[2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1427593533-9019-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
[3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<20150327004054.2f6f34ee@bbrezillon>
Regards,
Mike
> ---
> drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c
> index 6ec79db..cbbe403 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c
> @@ -173,8 +173,7 @@ static long clk_pll_get_best_div_mul(struct clk_pll *pll, unsigned long rate,
> int i = 0;
>
> /* Check if parent_rate is a valid input rate */
> - if (parent_rate < characteristics->input.min ||
> - parent_rate > characteristics->input.max)
> + if (parent_rate < characteristics->input.min)
> return -ERANGE;
>
> /*
> @@ -187,6 +186,15 @@ static long clk_pll_get_best_div_mul(struct clk_pll *pll, unsigned long rate,
> if (!mindiv)
> mindiv = 1;
>
> + if (parent_rate > characteristics->input.max) {
> + tmpdiv = DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, characteristics->input.max);
> + if (tmpdiv > PLL_DIV_MAX)
> + return -ERANGE;
> +
> + if (tmpdiv > mindiv)
> + mindiv = tmpdiv;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Calculate the maximum divider which is limited by PLL register
> * layout (limited by the MUL or DIV field size).
> --
> 1.9.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-13 4:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-29 1:53 [PATCH] clk: at91: pll: fix input range validity check Boris Brezillon
2015-04-13 4:37 ` Michael Turquette [this message]
2015-04-14 17:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-06-18 10:59 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150413043725.19585.5717@quantum \
--to=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jonas@microbit.se \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).