From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com ([209.85.212.170]:34555 "EHLO mail-wi0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752540AbbERJKy (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2015 05:10:54 -0400 Received: by wicmc15 with SMTP id mc15so84080214wic.1 for ; Mon, 18 May 2015 02:10:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 10:10:49 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Johan Hovold Cc: Mark Brown , Support Opensource , Samuel Ortiz , Liam Girdwood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Milo Kim , patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, Fabio Estevam , Marek Szyprowski , stable Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: da9052: fix broken regulator probe Message-ID: <20150518091049.GN22418@x1> References: <20150326083209.GE5951@x1> <20150414130406.GA26326@localhost> <20150429074420.GA24139@localhost> <20150429084152.GP9169@x1> <20150513154333.GB19543@x1> <20150513160836.GZ2761@sirena.org.uk> <20150513165419.GF19543@x1> <20150513172936.GE2761@sirena.org.uk> <20150514071943.GA20358@x1> <20150515144739.GC13976@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20150515144739.GC13976@localhost> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 15 May 2015, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 08:19:43AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 13 May 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 05:54:19PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > On Wed, 13 May 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > > > > If you're looking for me to review something you need to send it to me, > > > > > and the chances of me looking at it are very much increased if there's a > > > > > relevant subject line. I'm CCed (not even on the to list) on endless > > > > > large threads and reposts of patch serieses about MFD drivers most of > > > > > which are of very little relevance to me so they get ignored very > > > > > easily. > > > > > > > Calm down dear, it's only a commercial. > > > > > > > I wasn't having a pop. Rather empathising with your situation and > > > > facilitating a resend that you're likely to see. > > > > > > > I'm sure Johan will do the right thing. > > > > > > My point is that a simple resend has a reasonable chance of getting > > > dropped on the floor. > > > > As I say, I'm sure Johan will do what's required for that not to > > happen. > > Seriously? *Me* do the right thing? Yes, *you*. If a patch slips though a Maintainer's net, which does happen every so often [*], I'm sure even you are not infallible to that, a submitter must issue a RESEND (as you have now just done so). > We have a regression in your subsystems (mfd/regulator) with a fix > that's been sitting in both your mailboxes since March 25th. Fully aware and ready to apply once the correct process has been carried out. I get shirty when people submit MFD patches without permission, and I refuse to be a hypocrite. > And now that Mark finally responds to a mail after repeated reminders > from both me and Lee, he still doesn't care enough to look up the > original mail or at least make sure that a resend does not get lost > again. See [*] about how Mark deals with his torrent of daily mail. > You two even work for the same organisation. Irrelevant. > Just pick up the phone or > find a way to get a message across that mail filter instead of wasting > everyone else's time. > > I have resent the patch now. Please make sure it gets applied. [*] Especially when you receive as much email as Mark does. To cope he has a brain-highpass-filter on the subject line and purges his inbox regularly. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog