From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:51792 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932473AbbFSUlg (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:41:36 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Filipe Manana , David Sterba , Chris Mason Subject: [PATCH 4.0 099/105] Btrfs: send, add missing check for dead clone root Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 13:36:29 -0700 Message-Id: <20150619203601.161417882@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20150619203558.187802739@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20150619203558.187802739@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 4.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Filipe Manana commit 5cc2b17e80cf5770f2e585c2d90fd8af1b901258 upstream. After we locked the root's root item, a concurrent snapshot deletion call might have set the dead flag on it. So check if the dead flag is set and abort if it is, just like we do for the parent root. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Chris Mason Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/btrfs/send.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/btrfs/send.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c @@ -5855,7 +5855,8 @@ long btrfs_ioctl_send(struct file *mnt_f clone_sources_to_rollback = i + 1; spin_lock(&clone_root->root_item_lock); clone_root->send_in_progress++; - if (!btrfs_root_readonly(clone_root)) { + if (!btrfs_root_readonly(clone_root) || + btrfs_root_dead(clone_root)) { spin_unlock(&clone_root->root_item_lock); srcu_read_unlock(&fs_info->subvol_srcu, index); ret = -EPERM; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in