From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro Subject: [PATCH 3.14 117/125] 9p: forgetting to cancel request on interrupted zero-copy RPC Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:41:57 -0700 Message-Id: <20150731194031.253491189@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20150731194027.037807932@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20150731194027.037807932@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Al Viro commit a84b69cb6e0a41e86bc593904faa6def3b957343 upstream. If we'd already sent a request and decide to abort it, we *must* issue TFLUSH properly and not just blindly reuse the tag, or we'll get seriously screwed when response eventually arrives and we confuse it for response to later request that had reused the same tag. Signed-off-by: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/9p/client.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/net/9p/client.c +++ b/net/9p/client.c @@ -839,7 +839,8 @@ static struct p9_req_t *p9_client_zc_rpc if (err < 0) { if (err == -EIO) c->status = Disconnected; - goto reterr; + if (err != -ERESTARTSYS) + goto reterr; } if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_ERROR) { p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "req_status error %d\n", req->t_err);