From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com ([209.85.212.170]:37190 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751887AbbHZNIP (ORCPT
	<rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:08:15 -0400
Received: by widdq5 with SMTP id dq5so14885161wid.0
        for <stable@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 06:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:08:11 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Goel, Akash" <akash.goel@intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Set the map-and-fenceable flag for
 preallocated objects
Message-ID: <20150826130811.GQ1367@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1440521310-8931-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
 <1440590157-4423-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
 <20150826130659.GP1367@phenom.ffwll.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150826130659.GP1367@phenom.ffwll.local>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:06:59PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:55:57PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > As we mark the preallocated objects as bound, we should also flag them
> > correctly as being map-and-fenceable (if appropriate!) so that latter
> > users do not get confused and try and rebind the pinned vma in order to
> > get a map-and-fenceable binding.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: "Goel, Akash" <akash.goel@intel.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> 
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> 
> Jani, can you please pick up both? And some bugzilla references for either
> would be great too - Chris?
> 
> Oh and does patch 1 fix the execlist resume troubles? Execlist having
> bigger contexts might be enough explanations for the apparent regression.
> 
> And can we igt patch 1 somehow? E.g. with memory pressure plus doing an
> mmap on the legacy fbdev ...

Actually add Jani ...
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch