From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:48384 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755936AbbI0Pct (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Sep 2015 11:32:49 -0400 Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 08:32:48 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Sudip Mukherjee Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck , Linus Torvalds , akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah.kh@samsung.com, Daniel Axtens , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl: Don't remove AFUs/vPHBs in cxl_reset Message-ID: <20150927153248.GC28565@kroah.com> References: <56073970.7060303@roeck-us.net> <1443336521-28119-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1443336521-28119-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:18:41PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > From: Daniel Axtens > > commit 4e1efb403c1c016ae831bd9988a7d2e5e0af41a0 upstream. > > If the driver doesn't participate in EEH, the AFUs will be removed > by cxl_remove, which will be invoked by EEH. > > If the driver does particpate in EEH, the vPHB needs to stick around > so that the it can particpate. > > In both cases, we shouldn't remove the AFU/vPHB. > > Reviewed-by: Cyril Bur > Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman > Reported-by: Guenter Roeck > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee > Cc: # 4.1.9 Thanks for this, now applied. greg k-h