From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:57425 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752852AbbI0SaR (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Sep 2015 14:30:17 -0400 Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 19:06:33 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Denys Vlasenko , Leif Lindholm , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , stable , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Brian Gerst , Dave Young , "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , Ard Biesheuvel , Linus Torvalds , Peter Jones , Matt Fleming , Matt Fleming , Borislav Petkov , "Lee, Chun-Yi" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/efi: Map EFI memmap entries in-order at runtime Message-ID: <20150927180633.GA29466@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1443218539-7610-2-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20150926055643.GA25877@gmail.com> <0568D1D7-B6AA-437C-ADCE-A86D7A2E4722@zytor.com> <20150926195755.GC3144@codeblueprint.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 09:30:48AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Sep 26, 2015 1:19 PM, "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > > > > Sadly a lot of firmware is known to fail in that configuration :( That was very much our guest choice. > > > > Why can't we map everything completely 1:1 (VA = PA) and call the > setVA thing but pass it literally the identity. Last time I tried this I found that some firmware makes assumptions about having high addresses. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org