From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Thomas D <whissi@whissi.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, luto@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 0/6] x86/nmi/64: Stable backports for CVE-2015-3290 and CVE-2015-5157
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 16:11:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150929141105.GC24418@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1439993512-5196-1-git-send-email-whissi@whissi.de>
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 04:11:46PM +0200, Thomas D wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here's my backport for CVE-2015-3290 and CVE-2015-5157 for linux-3.14.
All now queued up, thanks for this.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-29 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-17 10:39 Request for stable 3.18.y and 3.14.y inclusion: Fix for CVE-2015-3290 (nmi) Thomas D.
2015-08-17 13:23 ` Greg KH
2015-08-17 22:55 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 0/6] x86/nmi/64: Stable backports for CVE-2015-3290 and CVE-2015-5157 Thomas D
2015-08-17 22:55 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 1/6] x86/nmi: Enable nested do_nmi() handling for 64-bit kernels Thomas D
2015-08-17 22:55 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 2/6] x86/nmi/64: Remove asm code that saves CR2 Thomas D
2015-08-17 22:55 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 3/6] x86/nmi/64: Switch stacks on userspace NMI entry Thomas D
2015-08-18 15:45 ` Jiri Slaby
2015-08-18 17:12 ` Thomas D.
2015-08-18 19:32 ` Jiri Slaby
2015-08-19 14:11 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 0/6] x86/nmi/64: Stable backports for CVE-2015-3290 and CVE-2015-5157 Thomas D
2015-08-19 14:11 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 1/6] x86/nmi: Enable nested do_nmi() handling for 64-bit kernels Thomas D
2015-09-29 13:38 ` Greg KH
2015-08-19 14:11 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 2/6] x86/nmi/64: Remove asm code that saves CR2 Thomas D
2015-08-19 14:11 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 3/6] x86/nmi/64: Switch stacks on userspace NMI entry Thomas D
2015-08-19 14:11 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 4/6] x86/nmi/64: Improve nested NMI comments Thomas D
2015-08-19 14:11 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 5/6] x86/nmi/64: Reorder nested NMI checks Thomas D
2015-08-19 14:11 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 6/6] x86/nmi/64: Use DF to avoid userspace RSP confusing nested NMI detection Thomas D
2015-09-29 14:11 ` Greg KH [this message]
2015-08-17 22:55 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 4/6] x86/nmi/64: Improve nested NMI comments Thomas D
2015-08-17 22:55 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 5/6] x86/nmi/64: Reorder nested NMI checks Thomas D
2015-08-17 22:55 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 6/6] x86/nmi/64: Use DF to avoid userspace RSP confusing nested NMI detection Thomas D
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150929141105.GC24418@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=whissi@whissi.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).