From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: linux@roeck-us.net, mark.rutland@arm.com,
peter.maydell@linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
will.deacon@arm.com
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: kernel: fix architected PMU registers unconditional" failed to apply to 4.1-stable tree
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:34:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160201123413.GA10764@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454267851666@kroah.com>
Hi Greg,
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 11:17:31AM -0800, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>
> The patch below does not apply to the 4.1-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
I will also backport a dependendency and send them to stable as a
series.
What's the standard mechanism for tagging backports (ie how do
you prefer me stating which stable kernel version the series
should be applied to - eg v4.1.17 ?) Usual Cc: tag or a line in
the commit log would do ?
Thanks,
Lorenzo
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>
> From f436b2ac90a095746beb6729b8ee8ed87c9eaede Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:50:03 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: kernel: fix architected PMU registers unconditional
> access
>
> The Performance Monitors extension is an optional feature of the
> AArch64 architecture, therefore, in order to access Performance
> Monitors registers safely, the kernel should detect the architected
> PMU unit presence through the ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 register PMUVer field
> before accessing them.
>
> This patch implements a guard by reading the ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 register
> PMUVer field to detect the architected PMU presence and prevent accessing
> PMU system registers if the Performance Monitors extension is not
> implemented in the core.
>
> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Fixes: 60792ad349f3 ("arm64: kernel: enforce pmuserenr_el0 initialization and restore")
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> index ffe9c2b6431b..917d98108b3f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> @@ -514,9 +514,14 @@ CPU_LE( movk x0, #0x30d0, lsl #16 ) // Clear EE and E0E on LE systems
> #endif
>
> /* EL2 debug */
> + mrs x0, id_aa64dfr0_el1 // Check ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 PMUVer
> + sbfx x0, x0, #8, #4
> + cmp x0, #1
> + b.lt 4f // Skip if no PMU present
> mrs x0, pmcr_el0 // Disable debug access traps
> ubfx x0, x0, #11, #5 // to EL2 and allow access to
> msr mdcr_el2, x0 // all PMU counters from EL1
> +4:
>
> /* Stage-2 translation */
> msr vttbr_el2, xzr
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc-macros.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc-macros.S
> index 146bd99a7532..e6a30e1268a8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc-macros.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc-macros.S
> @@ -84,3 +84,15 @@
> b.lo 9998b
> dsb \domain
> .endm
> +
> +/*
> + * reset_pmuserenr_el0 - reset PMUSERENR_EL0 if PMUv3 present
> + */
> + .macro reset_pmuserenr_el0, tmpreg
> + mrs \tmpreg, id_aa64dfr0_el1 // Check ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 PMUVer
> + sbfx \tmpreg, \tmpreg, #8, #4
> + cmp \tmpreg, #1 // Skip if no PMU present
> + b.lt 9000f
> + msr pmuserenr_el0, xzr // Disable PMU access from EL0
> +9000:
> + .endm
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> index a3d867e723b4..c164d2cb35c0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ ENTRY(cpu_do_resume)
> */
> ubfx x11, x11, #1, #1
> msr oslar_el1, x11
> - msr pmuserenr_el0, xzr // Disable PMU access from EL0
> + reset_pmuserenr_el0 x0 // Disable PMU access from EL0
> mov x0, x12
> dsb nsh // Make sure local tlb invalidation completed
> isb
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ ENTRY(__cpu_setup)
> msr cpacr_el1, x0 // Enable FP/ASIMD
> mov x0, #1 << 12 // Reset mdscr_el1 and disable
> msr mdscr_el1, x0 // access to the DCC from EL0
> - msr pmuserenr_el0, xzr // Disable PMU access from EL0
> + reset_pmuserenr_el0 x0 // Disable PMU access from EL0
> /*
> * Memory region attributes for LPAE:
> *
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-01 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-31 19:17 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: kernel: fix architected PMU registers unconditional" failed to apply to 4.1-stable tree gregkh
2016-02-01 12:34 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2016-02-01 20:43 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160201123413.GA10764@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).