From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:50650 "EHLO
	mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754026AbcBGVTU (ORCPT
	<rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 7 Feb 2016 16:19:20 -0500
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 13:19:20 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>,
	"Nemtsov, ArikX" <arikx.nemtsov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3.18] iwlwifi: pcie: support loading FW with extended
 mem range
Message-ID: <20160207211920.GA26012@kroah.com>
References: <1454878268-12184-1-git-send-email-emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
 <20160207210018.GA20507@kroah.com>
 <0BA3FCBA62E2DC44AF3030971E174FB32EA072CB@hasmsx107.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0BA3FCBA62E2DC44AF3030971E174FB32EA072CB@hasmsx107.ger.corp.intel.com>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 09:02:28PM +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
> 
> 
> On 02/07/2016 11:00 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 10:51:08PM +0200, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote:
> >> From: Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>
> >>
> >> [commit fe45773b5baa154468416aac1304f6325939f775 upstream]
> >>
> >> Toggle the LMPM_CHICK register when writing chunks into the FW's extended
> >> SRAM. This tells the FW to put the chunk into a different memory space.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Arik Nemtsov <arikx.nemtsov@intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> backporting this patch to 3.18 fixes
> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109531
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-prph.h   |  6 ++++++
> >>  drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/pcie/trans.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > What stable tree(s) do you want this to be applied to?
> 
> That was fast :) 3.18 as said in the title of the patch. Do you have any
> preference on how to indicate that?

Ugh, no, you did it right, I just didn't read the subject: my fault,
sorry for the noise...