From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 14:22:15 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Shuah Khan Cc: Willy Tarreau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah.kh@samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/64] 3.10.97-stable review Message-ID: <20160219222215.GB5737@kroah.com> References: <20160214222221.031471863@linuxfoundation.org> <56C20749.1010405@osg.samsung.com> <20160217203016.GA29946@kroah.com> <56C4D9DE.1090405@osg.samsung.com> <20160217232651.GB31125@1wt.eu> <56C50359.5040600@osg.samsung.com> <56C5395B.9060002@osg.samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <56C5395B.9060002@osg.samsung.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 08:24:11PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 02/17/2016 04:33 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > > On 02/17/2016 04:26 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 01:36:46PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > >>>>> Compiled, but didn't boot on my test system. > >>>>> Unfortunately, I won't be able to debug this > >>>>> until Wednesday. > >>>> > >>>> Were you able to figure this out? > >>>> > >>> > >>> I am working on bisect today. I should have something > >>> for you later this afternoon. > >> > >> Just FWIW I have it running here in KVM with a simplified config, so it > >> might be something related to a specific feature or driver but not > >> necessarily in the core itself. > >> > > > > git bisect tells me it is > > > > Arnd Bergmann > > remoteproc: avoid stack overflow in debugfs file > > > > This commit is also in 3.14.61-rc1 which worked just fine. > > It is in 4.3.6-rc1 which does fail. > > > > I am building without it now to make sure it is the > > offending commit > > > > Sanity returns. Please remove the following commit: > > Ryan Ware > EVM: Use crypto_memneq() for digest comparisons > > This commit can't stand on its own. crypto_memneq() > isn't defined. With this change removed, it all works > well. > > CC security/integrity/evm/evm_main.o^M > security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c: In function �<80><98>evm_verify_hmac�<80><99>:^M > security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c:132:3: error: implicit declaration of function �<80><98>crypto_memneq�<80><99> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]^M > rc = crypto_memneq(xattr_data->digest, calc.digest,^M > ^^M > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors^M > make[3]: *** [security/integrity/evm/evm_main.o] Error 1^M > make[2]: *** [security/integrity/evm] Error 2^M > make[1]: *** [security/integrity] Error 2^M > make: *** [security] Error 2^M > > I think I didn't run make clean and ended up with a > bad install. Ah, I had removed that right after I did the -rc as Guenter had reported it being an issue as well. thanks for tracking this down, and sorry for the duplicated effort. greg k-h