From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:44682 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758316AbcBXROT (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:14:19 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:14:18 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Steven Rostedt Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] tracepoints: Do not trace when cpu is offline" failed to apply to 3.14-stable tree Message-ID: <20160224171418.GF16597@kroah.com> References: <1456274927200208@kroah.com> <20160223222440.2c1539a6@grimm.local.home> <20160224033704.GA14166@kroah.com> <20160224101832.7890cd33@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160224101832.7890cd33@gandalf.local.home> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:18:32AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:37:04 -0800 > Greg KH wrote: > > > > Yes, it applies, sorry, but it breaks the build :( > > > > Same for 3.10-stable. It applies but can not compile. > > > > can you fix that up? > > > > Bah. smp.h isn't enough for using raw_smp_processor_id(). One must also > include percpu.h. That was fixed in mainline, but not in stable. But not > a big deal. I'll included percpu.h in tracepoint.h as well. What was the commit id that did that change? Is it simple enough to just take that patch instead? > > Here's the update for 3.14, and I'm guessing it would work in 3.10 as > well. I'll try it out. Thanks, I'll queue these up for the next round of stable releases after these. greg k-h