From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:36944 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934085AbcCOOgo (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:36:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:39:06 +0000 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Steven Rostedt Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, will.deacon@arm.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com Subject: Re: Patch "arm64: kernel: pause/unpause function graph tracer in cpu_suspend()" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree Message-ID: <20160315143906.GA14633@red-moon> References: <1453877690189116@kroah.com> <20160315140806.GA11376@red-moon> <20160315100753.7f97bf4c@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160315100753.7f97bf4c@gandalf.local.home> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:07:53AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:08:19 +0000 > Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > Hi Greg, > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:54:50PM -0800, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > > > > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > > > > > arm64: kernel: pause/unpause function graph tracer in cpu_suspend() > > > > > > to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at: > > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary > > > > > > The filename of the patch is: > > > arm64-kernel-pause-unpause-function-graph-tracer-in-cpu_suspend.patch > > > and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory. > > > > > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, > > > please let know about it. > > > > We have just noticed this patch did not make it to 3.18 stable kernel > > even though it was marked for #3.16+, probably it has slipped through > > the cracks, please let us know what we can do to get it applied > > to the 3.18 stable tree. > > > > Does it apply without conflicts or break the build? I checked when I marked it for stable 3.16+ but to make sure everything is fine I have just rechecked against 3.18.28, it applies cleanly and does not break the build so I hope it can be considered for inclusion. Thanks, Lorenzo