stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	lwn@lwn.net
Subject: Re: stable-security kernel updates
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:12:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160421141209.GA9930@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5718DD39.40808@oracle.com>

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:01:29AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > What are you "stop-gapping" then?  The 7-10 days between stable
> > releases?
> 
> In a perfect world where everyone has a team of kernel hackers on hand
> reviewing stable commits, verifying the resulting kernel doesn't regress
> their product, and fixes existing regressions for their product it might
> be 7-10 days.
> 
> In the real world, this process takes much longer.
> 
> Doing a full rebase of the kernel tree is a much more costly process than
> cherry picking a handful of security commits.

Usually what is being done is mostly to check the intersection areas
between local patches and the updated parts from the next kernel. I'm
not saying it doesn't take some time, I mean for most products, only
certain areas are being considered since you usually have lots of
"CONFIG_* is not set" in a product. It's totally different for a distro
however.

Regards,
Willy

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-21 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-20 19:50 stable-security kernel updates Sasha Levin
2016-04-21  6:43 ` Jiri Slaby
2016-04-21  7:11   ` Willy Tarreau
2016-04-21 11:27     ` Sasha Levin
2016-04-21 12:36       ` Greg KH
2016-04-21 14:01         ` Sasha Levin
2016-04-21 14:12           ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2016-04-21 11:11   ` Sasha Levin
2016-04-21 11:59     ` Jiri Slaby
2016-04-21 12:05       ` Jiri Slaby
2016-04-21 12:39         ` Greg KH
2016-04-21 12:50           ` Willy Tarreau
2016-04-21 13:54           ` Sasha Levin
2016-04-21 14:13             ` Jiri Slaby
2016-04-21 14:19               ` Willy Tarreau
2016-04-21 14:27               ` Sasha Levin
2016-04-21 14:33                 ` Willy Tarreau
2016-04-25 23:14                   ` Ben Hutchings
2016-04-26  4:40                     ` Willy Tarreau
2016-04-21 13:53       ` Sasha Levin
2016-04-21 14:54         ` Jiri Slaby
2016-04-21 15:50           ` Sasha Levin
2016-04-21 19:32           ` Sasha Levin
2016-04-21 12:26     ` Bjørn Mork
2016-04-21 12:56 ` Willy Tarreau
2016-04-21 14:16   ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160421141209.GA9930@1wt.eu \
    --to=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lwn@lwn.net \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).