From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:33945 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750922AbcEIG5F (ORCPT
	<rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 9 May 2016 02:57:05 -0400
Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id n129so19058174wmn.1
        for <stable@vger.kernel.org>; Sun, 08 May 2016 23:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 08:57:03 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?=
	<ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: Terminate panel
 control GPIO lookup table correctly
Message-ID: <20160509065703.GL27098@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1461353935-8078-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
 <CACRpkdasFcEAzDtHGU+unrsstyX+o1Ft=HAh22Esm5Z3KZ=2ug@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160502081938.GG14148@phenom.ffwll.local>
 <20160504073217.GB1503@dell.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20160504073217.GB1503@dell.home>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 08:32:17AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 02 May 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:31:44AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:38 PM,  <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > From: Ville Syrj�l� <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > GPIO lookup tables are supposed to be zero terminated. Let's do that
> > > > and avoid accidentally walking off the end.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > > > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
> > > > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> > > > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > > Fixes: 61dd2ca2d44e ("mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: Add lookup table for Panel Control as GPIO signal")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrj�l� <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > 
> > Applied to drm-intel trees, thanks for patch, reviews&acks.
> 
> Do what now?  How can you apply a patch for a subsystem you don't have
> responsibility for?  This is bound to cause merge conflicts.

Oh crap, I thought Linus' ack was for the mfd stuff and didn't bother
double-checking with MAINTAINTERS. Should I throw it out again and you'll
pick it up, or ok as such?

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch