From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Wei Fang <fangwei1@huawei.com>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, jack@suse.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
tj@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs/dcache.c: avoid soft-lockup in dput()
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:51:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160622065128.GB28443@insomnia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466564475-30417-1-git-send-email-fangwei1@huawei.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1928 bytes --]
Hi Wei Fang,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:01:15AM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> We triggered soft-lockup under stress test which
> open/access/write/close one file concurrently on more than
> five different CPUs:
>
> WARN: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [who:30631]
> ...
> [<ffffffc0003986f8>] dput+0x100/0x298
> [<ffffffc00038c2dc>] terminate_walk+0x4c/0x60
> [<ffffffc00038f56c>] path_lookupat+0x5cc/0x7a8
> [<ffffffc00038f780>] filename_lookup+0x38/0xf0
> [<ffffffc000391180>] user_path_at_empty+0x78/0xd0
> [<ffffffc0003911f4>] user_path_at+0x1c/0x28
> [<ffffffc00037d4fc>] SyS_faccessat+0xb4/0x230
>
> ->d_lock trylock may failed many times because of concurrently
> operations, and dput() may execute a long time.
>
> Fix this by replacing cpu_relax() with cond_resched().
> dput() used to be sleepable, so make it sleepable again
> should be safe.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <fangwei1@huawei.com>
> ---
> Changes v1->v2:
> - add might_sleep() to annotate that dput() can sleep
>
> fs/dcache.c | 4 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
> index d5ecc6e..074fc1c 100644
> --- a/fs/dcache.c
> +++ b/fs/dcache.c
> @@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static struct dentry *dentry_kill(struct dentry *dentry)
>
> failed:
> spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
> - cpu_relax();
> + cond_resched();
Is it better to put the cond_resched() in the caller(i.e. dput()), right
before "goto repeat"? Because it's obviously a loop there, which makes
the purpose of cond_resched() more straightforward.
Regards,
Boqun
> return dentry; /* try again with same dentry */
> }
>
> @@ -752,6 +752,8 @@ void dput(struct dentry *dentry)
> return;
>
> repeat:
> + might_sleep();
> +
> rcu_read_lock();
> if (likely(fast_dput(dentry))) {
> rcu_read_unlock();
> --
> 1.7.1
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-22 6:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-22 3:01 [PATCH v2] fs/dcache.c: avoid soft-lockup in dput() Wei Fang
2016-06-22 6:51 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2016-07-06 2:36 ` Wei Fang
2016-09-16 7:49 ` Vaishali Thakkar
2016-09-16 12:10 ` Al Viro
2016-09-16 12:50 ` Vaishali Thakkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160622065128.GB28443@insomnia \
--to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fangwei1@huawei.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).