From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f195.google.com ([209.85.192.195]:34903 "EHLO mail-pf0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753751AbcHSDO4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2016 23:14:56 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:14:17 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Tso , Eric Biggers Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.14 14/46] random: properly align get_random_int_hash Message-ID: <20160819031417.GA876@zzz> References: <20160818135442.457400364@linuxfoundation.org> <20160818135444.550472497@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160818135444.550472497@linuxfoundation.org> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: get_random_long() was added in v4.5 and doesn't appear to have been backported to any stable branches, so my patch doesn't actually need to be backported to anything older than v4.5. It won't break anything, though. On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 03:54:36PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > ------------------ > > From: Eric Biggers > > commit b1132deac01c2332d234fa821a70022796b79182 upstream. > > get_random_long() reads from the get_random_int_hash array using an > unsigned long pointer. For this code to be guaranteed correct on all > architectures, the array must be aligned to an unsigned long boundary. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers > Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > --- > drivers/char/random.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > --- a/drivers/char/random.c > +++ b/drivers/char/random.c > @@ -1632,13 +1632,15 @@ int random_int_secret_init(void) > return 0; > } > > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(__u32 [MD5_DIGEST_WORDS], get_random_int_hash) > + __aligned(sizeof(unsigned long)); > + > /* > * Get a random word for internal kernel use only. Similar to urandom but > * with the goal of minimal entropy pool depletion. As a result, the random > * value is not cryptographically secure but for several uses the cost of > * depleting entropy is too high > */ > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(__u32 [MD5_DIGEST_WORDS], get_random_int_hash); > unsigned int get_random_int(void) > { > __u32 *hash; > >