From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vince@deater.net,
eranian@google.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org#4.7
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fix an off-by-one in address filter configuration
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 16:29:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160915132944.10331-2-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160915132944.10331-1-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
PT address filter configuration requires that a range is specified by
its first and last address, but at the moment we're obtaining the end
of the range by adding user specified size to its start, which is off
by one from what it actually needs to be.
Fix this and make sure that zero-sized filters don't pass the filter
validation.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7
Reported-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
index 04bb5fb5a8..5ec0100e3f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
@@ -1081,7 +1081,7 @@ static int pt_event_addr_filters_validate(struct list_head *filters)
list_for_each_entry(filter, filters, entry) {
/* PT doesn't support single address triggers */
- if (!filter->range)
+ if (!filter->range || !filter->size)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (!filter->inode && !kernel_ip(filter->offset))
@@ -1111,7 +1111,7 @@ static void pt_event_addr_filters_sync(struct perf_event *event)
} else {
/* apply the offset */
msr_a = filter->offset + offs[range];
- msr_b = filter->size + msr_a;
+ msr_b = filter->size + msr_a - 1;
}
filters->filter[range].msr_a = msr_a;
--
2.9.3
next parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-15 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20160915132944.10331-1-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
2016-09-15 13:29 ` Alexander Shishkin [this message]
2016-09-15 13:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf/x86: Tighten up the kernel_ip() check Alexander Shishkin
2016-09-15 14:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-15 13:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf/x86/intel/pt: Do validate the size of a kernel address filter Alexander Shishkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160915132944.10331-2-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--to=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org#4.7 \
--cc=vince@deater.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).