From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vince@deater.net,
eranian@google.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org#v4.7
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] perf/x86/intel/pt: Do validate the size of a kernel address filter
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 18:13:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160915151352.21306-4-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160915151352.21306-1-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Right now, the kernel address filters in PT are prone to integer overflow
that may happen in adding filter's size to its offset to obtain the end
of the range. Such an overflow would also throw a #GP in the PT event
configuration path.
Fix this by explicitly validating the result of this calculation.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.7
Reported-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
index 1f94963a28..861a7d9cb6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
@@ -1089,8 +1089,13 @@ static int pt_event_addr_filters_validate(struct list_head *filters)
if (!filter->range || !filter->size)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- if (!filter->inode && !valid_kernel_ip(filter->offset))
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (!filter->inode) {
+ if (!valid_kernel_ip(filter->offset))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (!valid_kernel_ip(filter->offset + filter->size))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
if (++range > pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_num_address_ranges))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
--
2.9.3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-15 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20160915151352.21306-1-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
2016-09-15 15:13 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fix an off-by-one in address filter configuration Alexander Shishkin
2016-09-15 15:13 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fix kernel address filter's offset validation Alexander Shishkin
2016-09-15 15:13 ` Alexander Shishkin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160915151352.21306-4-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--to=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org#v4.7 \
--cc=vince@deater.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).