From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from messenger.jmp-e.com ([45.32.25.6]:44065 "EHLO messenger.jmp-e.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753178AbcITJKF (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2016 05:10:05 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:09:56 +0100 From: James To: Greg KH Cc: starblue@users.sourceforge.net, legousb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, security@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: misc: legousbtower: Fix NULL pointer deference Message-ID: <20160920090955.GA25681@hostname> References: <20160919180950.GA26819@hostname> <20160920062232.GB14316@kroah.com> <1474359501.4358.2.camel@suse.com> <20160920083256.GA12786@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160920083256.GA12786@kroah.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi greg,=20 Many appologies, I did not see your patch attached/forgot it=20 existed when I fixed this yesterday. I created this patch based on your feedback from my original email on September 2nd. I have tested=20 this patch with an emulated device and it fixes the vulnerability. Again, applogies for the long delay and patch confusion. Best regards, James On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:32:56AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: >On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:18:21AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: >> On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 08:22 +0200, Greg KH wrote: >> > When you sent this the last time (back on Sept 2), I sent you a >> > "simpler" patch, the same one below, and asked you if that worked >> > instead. I never heard back, could you test this patch and see if it >> > resolves the issue for you? >> >> As far as I can tell, your patches are identical. > >Hah, so they are. James's original patch was not this one, sorry for >not looking at it closer. > >James, any reason why you are passing off my patch as yours here? Did >you test mine and see that this did solve the problem? You did change >your changelog text a bit, to reflect the change between mine and yours, >so I'm guessing that you did? > >thanks, > >greg k-h --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX4PzdAAoJEF3Q5OlBOF7iN/kP/jKJ1iDV7kaLfFfyGHkcBboo o1OB2sa1bCw+2m+snNVz4o2QeNi226QuJKCpNN1c0x/X/UImj+jF4Q1qdHBrfG+r wjLmhAIDNRC9oJVqSLhCdlDlEv3+1kzKcWQB08je0r6Cqysh0BjtjW70aKch5bPs qI/QOnF/Glj/qUf2OvIIPBanqQjmq92A0TwmLxrtVHo5BUsbenwBBgNfuMrKQEdN P5tp+8gdyEuJaQPozbHTNFasm+tR6WPtcg+Nbeaq2zY4grQPFtHfqLwuk/l0nDTh DwddvH3tr7TBRjF9uyco2trQpm/RK+C/qinzVvKSGvamKIIIkLKrR80/MNqb1fIu wXZ4v4k9khBSLOp7rcMWXhCMQDYTs7CPFWYoFGsQIuCWwHAOyuhzKi+uAax5IcQT bWGqW15LKHW3NbSp5Z+PdpsN6YGScmA7pXfCgxTj8ZtIDk+Z41cytatXpCgfc+Pm mDGSAIpqK8s4zVPyzHlsKkt+UiIc3Lhu0LpeZkwk7kFW/S0LFvJzg6O/2/zo99As y70VPcmCIF+x41FcE4QqPbFVNVH4TdLwkGTL2G6R2zXjyFd6SrWdw8a45zlJZNwh n0FOkJRJJ003TdQAX6zuCowZENh8QN6eeXQ+sA4NHFrk0YRbMnIk98rMZKsvm2Ty RWTBqSVtFjH9v4B+If4Q =2+ln -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--