From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:48694 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751021AbcKIIsw (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 03:48:52 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 09:49:00 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Sumit Saxena Cc: Kashyap Desai , emilne@redhat.com, hare@suse.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, thenzl@redhat.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Patch "scsi: megaraid_sas: Fix data integrity failure for JBOD (passthrough) devices" has been added to the 4.8-stable tree Message-ID: <20161109084900.GA16641@kroah.com> References: <147867953433155@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 02:15:10PM +0530, Sumit Saxena wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org] > >Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 1:49 PM > >To: kashyap.desai@broadcom.com; emilne@redhat.com; > >gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; hare@suse.com; martin.petersen@oracle.com; > >sumit.saxena@broadcom.com; thenzl@redhat.com > >Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org; stable-commits@vger.kernel.org > >Subject: Patch "scsi: megaraid_sas: Fix data integrity failure for JBOD > >(passthrough) devices" has been added to the 4.8-stable tree > > > > > >This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > > > scsi: megaraid_sas: Fix data integrity failure for JBOD (passthrough) > devices > > > >to the 4.8-stable tree which can be found at: > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable- > >queue.git;a=summary > > > >The filename of the patch is: > > scsi-megaraid_sas-fix-data-integrity-failure-for-jbod-passthrough- > >devices.patch > >and it can be found in the queue-4.8 subdirectory. > > > >If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, > please let > > know about it. > > There will be follow up patch which I will be sending in sometime so > follow patch needs to be applied along with this patch. Does that mean that this patch on its own is broken? confused, greg k-h