stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Jason@zx2c4.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: char: mem: Fix thinko in kmem address checks
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 12:45:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170104114532.GA6449@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <641a72e66f81d1244d8420074bc5def88d3929d4.1483529604.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>

On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 11:37:49AM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> When borrowing the pfn_valid() check from mmap_kmem(), somebody managed

"sombody"?  :)

> to get physical and virtual addresses spectacularly muddled up, such
> that we've ended up with checks for one being the other. Whilst this
> does indeed prevent out-of-bounds accesses crashing, on most systems it
> also prevents the more desirable use-case of working at all ever.
> 
> Check the *virtual* offset correctly for what it is.
> 
> Reported-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 148a1bc84398 ("drivers: char: mem: Check {read,write}_kmem() addresses")
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/mem.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/mem.c b/drivers/char/mem.c
> index 5bb1985ec484..bdc6a4018604 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/mem.c
> @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static ssize_t read_kmem(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
>  	char *kbuf; /* k-addr because vread() takes vmlist_lock rwlock */
>  	int err = 0;
>  
> -	if (!pfn_valid(PFN_DOWN(p)))
> +	if (!virt_addr_valid(p))
>  		return -EIO;
>  
>  	read = 0;
> @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static ssize_t write_kmem(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
>  	char *kbuf; /* k-addr because vwrite() takes vmlist_lock rwlock */
>  	int err = 0;
>  
> -	if (!pfn_valid(PFN_DOWN(p)))
> +	if (!virt_addr_valid(p))
>  		return -EIO;
>  
>  	if (p < (unsigned long) high_memory) {

Jason, can you verify this fixes your test case?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-04 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-04 11:37 [PATCH] drivers: char: mem: Fix thinko in kmem address checks Robin Murphy
2017-01-04 11:45 ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-01-04 17:19   ` Greg KH
2017-01-04 16:46 ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-05 17:15 ` [PATCH v2] drivers: char: mem: Fix thinkos " Robin Murphy
2017-01-10 17:49   ` Greg KH
2017-01-11 19:18     ` Jason A. Donenfeld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170104114532.GA6449@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).