From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Jason@zx2c4.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: char: mem: Fix thinko in kmem address checks
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:19:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170104171953.GA23912@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170104114532.GA6449@kroah.com>
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:45:32PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 11:37:49AM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > When borrowing the pfn_valid() check from mmap_kmem(), somebody managed
>
> "sombody"? :)
>
> > to get physical and virtual addresses spectacularly muddled up, such
> > that we've ended up with checks for one being the other. Whilst this
> > does indeed prevent out-of-bounds accesses crashing, on most systems it
> > also prevents the more desirable use-case of working at all ever.
> >
> > Check the *virtual* offset correctly for what it is.
> >
> > Reported-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
> > CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Fixes: 148a1bc84398 ("drivers: char: mem: Check {read,write}_kmem() addresses")
> > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/char/mem.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/mem.c b/drivers/char/mem.c
> > index 5bb1985ec484..bdc6a4018604 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/mem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/mem.c
> > @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static ssize_t read_kmem(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> > char *kbuf; /* k-addr because vread() takes vmlist_lock rwlock */
> > int err = 0;
> >
> > - if (!pfn_valid(PFN_DOWN(p)))
> > + if (!virt_addr_valid(p))
> > return -EIO;
> >
> > read = 0;
> > @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static ssize_t write_kmem(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> > char *kbuf; /* k-addr because vwrite() takes vmlist_lock rwlock */
> > int err = 0;
> >
> > - if (!pfn_valid(PFN_DOWN(p)))
> > + if (!virt_addr_valid(p))
> > return -EIO;
> >
> > if (p < (unsigned long) high_memory) {
>
> Jason, can you verify this fixes your test case?
Well, it fails kbuild testing, so can you try it again?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-04 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-04 11:37 [PATCH] drivers: char: mem: Fix thinko in kmem address checks Robin Murphy
2017-01-04 11:45 ` Greg KH
2017-01-04 17:19 ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-01-04 16:46 ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-05 17:15 ` [PATCH v2] drivers: char: mem: Fix thinkos " Robin Murphy
2017-01-10 17:49 ` Greg KH
2017-01-11 19:18 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170104171953.GA23912@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).