From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: [PATCH 4.9 032/130] rcu: Remove cond_resched() from Tiny synchronize_sched() Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:54:32 +0100 Message-Id: <20170124075536.271368642@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20170124075534.905042535@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20170124075534.905042535@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Paul E. McKenney commit f466ae66fa6a599f9a53b5f9bafea4b8cfffa7fb upstream. It is now legal to invoke synchronize_sched() at early boot, which causes Tiny RCU's synchronize_sched() to emit spurious splats. This commit therefore removes the cond_resched() from Tiny RCU's synchronize_sched(). Fixes: 8b355e3bc140 ("rcu: Drive expedited grace periods from workqueue") Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/rcu/tiny.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c @@ -185,9 +185,6 @@ static __latent_entropy void rcu_process * benefits of doing might_sleep() to reduce latency.) * * Cool, huh? (Due to Josh Triplett.) - * - * But we want to make this a static inline later. The cond_resched() - * currently makes this problematic. */ void synchronize_sched(void) { @@ -195,7 +192,6 @@ void synchronize_sched(void) lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) || lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map), "Illegal synchronize_sched() in RCU read-side critical section"); - cond_resched(); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_sched);