stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Antoine Aubert <a.aubert@overkiz.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] USB: serial: ftdi_sio: fix extreme low-latency setting
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:35:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170125143520.10982-1-johan@kernel.org> (raw)

Since commit 557aaa7ffab6 ("ft232: support the ASYNC_LOW_LATENCY
flag") the FTDI driver has been using a receive latency-timer value of
1 ms instead of the device default of 16 ms.

The latency timer is used to periodically empty a non-full receive
buffer, but a status header is always sent when the timer expires
including when the buffer is empty. This means that a two-byte bulk
message is received every millisecond also for an otherwise idle port as
long as it is open.

Let's restore the pre-2009 behaviour which reduces rate of status
messages to 1/16th (e.g. interrupt frequency drops from 1 kHz to 62.5
Hz) by not setting ASYNC_LOW_LATENCY by default.

Anyone willing to pay the price for the minimum-latency behaviour should
set the flag explicitly instead using the TIOCSSERIAL ioctl or a tool
such as setserial (e.g. setserial /dev/ttyUSB0 low_latency).

Note that since commit 0cbd81a9f6ba ("USB: ftdi_sio: remove
tty->low_latency") the ASYNC_LOW_LATENCY flag has no other effects but
to set a minimal latency timer.

Reported-by: Antoine Aubert <a.aubert@overkiz.com>
Fixes: 557aaa7ffab6 ("ft232: support the ASYNC_LOW_LATENCY flag")
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>	# v2.6.31
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
---

Greg,

I've been aware of this overhead for a while, but never realised it was
actually a regression introduced in 2009.

Fixing something like this after such a long time obviously means
risking a regression for anyone who is now relying on the new default
behaviour instead. I still think it's reasonable in this case to restore
the earlier behaviour given the penalty everyone else is paying for a
minimal-latency behaviour that they likely do not need or want.

Whether this should go to stable is a different question. Perhaps the
stable tag is not warranted, and this should just be the default
behaviour going forward? What do you think?

Thanks,
Johan



 drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c b/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c
index b064fad8e3ee..4bd556d9307d 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c
@@ -1805,8 +1805,6 @@ static int ftdi_sio_port_probe(struct usb_serial_port *port)
 
 	mutex_init(&priv->cfg_lock);
 
-	priv->flags = ASYNC_LOW_LATENCY;
-
 	if (quirk && quirk->port_probe)
 		quirk->port_probe(priv);
 
-- 
2.10.2


             reply	other threads:[~2017-01-25 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-25 14:35 Johan Hovold [this message]
2017-01-25 15:06 ` [PATCH] USB: serial: ftdi_sio: fix extreme low-latency setting Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-01-25 15:14   ` Johan Hovold
2017-01-25 15:42     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-01-25 16:02       ` Johan Hovold
2017-01-25 15:19 ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170125143520.10982-1-johan@kernel.org \
    --to=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.aubert@overkiz.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).