From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:37574 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752297AbdBZQF4 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 26 Feb 2017 11:05:56 -0500
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:54:37 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net,
        patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.10 00/21] 4.10.1-stable review
Message-ID: <20170226155437.GB21482@kroah.com>
References: <20170224083851.364707301@linuxfoundation.org>
 <4610f988-7b7c-db33-3367-a4406db395e9@osg.samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4610f988-7b7c-db33-3367-a4406db395e9@osg.samsung.com>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:20:10AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 02/24/2017 01:39 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.10.1 release.
> > There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sun Feb 26 08:38:42 UTC 2017.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.10.1-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> 
> Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. When
> I did a reboot, shutdown sequence took longer than usual. I will
> look into this further later on this afternoon.
> 
> I don't think this is a show stopper though.

Let me know if you find anything, and thanks for testing all 3 of these.

greg k-h