From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:57674 "EHLO linux-mips.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP
        id S23993876AbdCTQnuY30K9 (ORCPT <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>
        + 1 other); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 17:43:50 +0100
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 17:43:48 +0100
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 04/35] MIPS: Update defconfigs for
 NF_CT_PROTO_DCCP/UDPLITE change
Message-ID: <20170320164347.GG14919@linux-mips.org>
References: <20170316142906.685052998@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20170316142906.994447562@linuxfoundation.org>
 <1489939516.2852.71.camel@decadent.org.uk>
 <20170320103052.GB3047@kroah.com>
 <CAK8P3a2Ud6iVEumhSzBpWwKN5SiuYOGSBT1ZAD=UiC8RNTv=SA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170320162930.GA23463@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170320162930.GA23463@kroah.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:29:30PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> You reported it there, but then on your other emails for other stable
> trees, said that your previously mentioned patches fixed problems in
> these trees as well.  A bit confusing, sorry I got it wrong.
> 
> Anyway, not a big deal, is this worth me reverting?  Does this cause an
> issue with these arches on older kernels?

Can't imagine this is going to cause an issue and in case of doubt a "y"
should be safer than a "m" anyway ...

  Ralf