stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
To: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Cc: <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
	Max Lohrmann <post@wickenrode.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] target: Fix VERIFY and WRITE VERIFY command parsing
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:12:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170330171244.8346-2-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170330171244.8346-1-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>

Use the value of the BYTCHK field to determine the size of the
Data-Out buffer. For VERIFY, honor the VRPROTECT, DPO and FUA
fields. This patch avoids that LIO complains about a mismatch
between the expected transfer length and the SCSI CDB length
if the value of the BYTCHK field is 0.

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Cc: Max Lohrmann <post@wickenrode.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
---
 drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c b/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
index c194063f169b..ee35c90e3b8d 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
@@ -828,6 +828,59 @@ sbc_check_dpofua(struct se_device *dev, struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char *cdb)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/**
+ * sbc_parse_verify - parse VERIFY, VERIFY_16 and WRITE VERIFY commands
+ * @cmd:     (in)  structure that describes the SCSI command to be parsed.
+ * @sectors: (out) Number of logical blocks on the storage medium that will be
+ *           affected by the SCSI command.
+ * @bufflen: (out) Expected length of the SCSI Data-Out buffer.
+ */
+static sense_reason_t sbc_parse_verify(struct se_cmd *cmd, int *sectors,
+				       u32 *bufflen)
+{
+	struct se_device *dev = cmd->se_dev;
+	u8 *cdb = cmd->t_task_cdb;
+	u8 bytchk = (cdb[1] >> 1) & 3;
+	sense_reason_t ret;
+
+	switch (cdb[0]) {
+	case VERIFY:
+	case WRITE_VERIFY:
+		*sectors = transport_get_sectors_10(cdb);
+		cmd->t_task_lba = transport_lba_32(cdb);
+		break;
+	case VERIFY_16:
+		*sectors = transport_get_sectors_16(cdb);
+		cmd->t_task_lba = transport_lba_64(cdb);
+		break;
+	default:
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(true);
+		return TCM_UNSUPPORTED_SCSI_OPCODE;
+	}
+
+	if (sbc_check_dpofua(dev, cmd, cdb))
+		return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD;
+
+	ret = sbc_check_prot(dev, cmd, cdb, *sectors, true);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	switch (bytchk) {
+	case 0:
+		*bufflen = 0;
+		break;
+	case 1:
+		*bufflen = sbc_get_size(cmd, *sectors);
+		cmd->se_cmd_flags |= SCF_SCSI_DATA_CDB;
+		break;
+	default:
+		pr_err("Unsupported BYTCHK value %d for SCSI opcode %#x\n",
+		       bytchk, cdb[0]);
+		return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD;
+	}
+	return TCM_NO_SENSE;
+}
+
 sense_reason_t
 sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
 {
@@ -895,7 +948,6 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
 		cmd->execute_cmd = sbc_execute_rw;
 		break;
 	case WRITE_10:
-	case WRITE_VERIFY:
 		sectors = transport_get_sectors_10(cdb);
 		cmd->t_task_lba = transport_lba_32(cdb);
 
@@ -909,6 +961,12 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
 		cmd->se_cmd_flags |= SCF_SCSI_DATA_CDB;
 		cmd->execute_cmd = sbc_execute_rw;
 		break;
+	case WRITE_VERIFY:
+		ret = sbc_parse_verify(cmd, &sectors, &size);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+		cmd->execute_cmd = sbc_execute_rw;
+		goto check_lba;
 	case WRITE_12:
 		sectors = transport_get_sectors_12(cdb);
 		cmd->t_task_lba = transport_lba_32(cdb);
@@ -1106,14 +1164,9 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
 		break;
 	case VERIFY:
 	case VERIFY_16:
-		size = 0;
-		if (cdb[0] == VERIFY) {
-			sectors = transport_get_sectors_10(cdb);
-			cmd->t_task_lba = transport_lba_32(cdb);
-		} else {
-			sectors = transport_get_sectors_16(cdb);
-			cmd->t_task_lba = transport_lba_64(cdb);
-		}
+		ret = sbc_parse_verify(cmd, &sectors, &size);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 		cmd->execute_cmd = sbc_emulate_noop;
 		goto check_lba;
 	case REZERO_UNIT:
-- 
2.12.0

       reply	other threads:[~2017-03-30 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20170330171244.8346-1-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
2017-03-30 17:12 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-04-02 22:43   ` [PATCH 1/6] target: Fix VERIFY and WRITE VERIFY command parsing Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-03-30 17:12 ` [PATCH 2/6] target/iscsi: Call .iscsit_release_cmd() once Bart Van Assche
2017-04-02 22:59   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-04-04  5:06     ` Varun Prakash
2017-04-13  7:44       ` Varun Prakash
2017-05-02  4:33         ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-05-07 12:52           ` Varun Prakash
2017-05-09  7:49             ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-05-10 16:03               ` Varun Prakash
2017-11-01  0:07       ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170330171244.8346-2-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    --cc=post@wickenrode.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).