From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:45838 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S932973AbdDFHnf (ORCPT
        <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 6 Apr 2017 03:43:35 -0400
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 09:43:23 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, yun.wang@profitbricks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] bio order fix backport for 4.4
Message-ID: <20170406074323.GH14752@kroah.com>
References: <1491212479-12527-1-git-send-email-jinpu.wangl@profitbricks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1491212479-12527-1-git-send-email-jinpu.wangl@profitbricks.com>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 11:41:17AM +0200, Jack Wang wrote:
> From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Please consider apply both fix for bio order, it fixes dead lock in
> MD/DRBD.
> 
> I backported to 4.4, and also tested on 4.4.50.
> 
> Both patches apply cleanly on 4.4.59.

Any reason these shouldn't also go into 4.10 and 4.9-stable?  They look
like they belong there, and I don't want patches in 4.4 that are not in
other stable trees, that wouldn't make any sense and would cause
regressions when people upgrade.

thanks,

greg k-h