From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [stable] Removing or restricting timer_stats
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:37:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170419153714.GA10969@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ab4a1c1-d052-a3ee-eaba-3494ece40773@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 08:25:53AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 4/19/2017 8:01 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > Arjan said it would break powertop, IIRC.
> > >
> > > So we broke it in 4.11? That doesn't seem to sound reasonable, how are
> > > you getting away with that? :)
> >
> > tglx seemed to think that the same information was available elsewhere?
>
> tglx was working on patches to make the same information available elsewhere *in the future*.
>
> unless you also backport that work (and wait for powertop to release/etc)...
> just backporting the interface break without backporting the new interface... leaves things stuck.
So, when 4.11 is released, things are then "stuck"? How is taking
something that shows up in 4.11 and adding it to 4.10 going to break
anything "worse"?
I think this probably needs to be removed from 4.11 (i.e. added back),
right?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-19 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-18 2:25 [stable] Removing or restricting timer_stats Ben Hutchings
2017-04-18 3:38 ` Kees Cook
2017-04-19 11:50 ` Greg KH
2017-04-19 14:54 ` Kees Cook
2017-04-19 14:57 ` Greg KH
2017-04-19 15:01 ` Kees Cook
2017-04-19 15:18 ` Greg KH
2017-04-19 15:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2017-04-19 15:37 ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-04-19 16:20 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170419153714.GA10969@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).