From: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi, nfit: fix the memory error check in nfit_handle_mce
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:54:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170421205410.GD10645@omniknight.lm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170421205050.GA17595@intel.com>
On 04/21, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 02:35:51PM -0600, Vishal Verma wrote:
> > On 04/21, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > Needs extra parentheses to make it right. Vishal, sorry I led you astray.
> > >
> > > if (!((mce->status & 0xef80) == BIT(7)))
> >
> > Is this still right though? Anything AND'ed with 0xef80 will never equal
> > BIT(7) which is simply 01000000 binary (the lowest byte of the left hand
> > side is '0')
>
> I think so ... here it is in binary
>
> ef80 = 1110 1111 1000 0000
> BIT7 = 0000 0000 1000 0000
>
> so the "&" will zap bits {6:0} and bit {12} [and everything not part
> of the MCACOD field].
>
> If mce->status had some bit above BIT(7) set, it won't be zapped, so we
> won't match the exact value BIT(7).
Ah, you're right, I was off by one, taking BIT(7) to mean 0100 0000
>
> -Tony
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-21 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-20 22:18 [PATCH] acpi, nfit: fix the memory error check in nfit_handle_mce Vishal Verma
2017-04-20 22:21 ` Verma, Vishal L
2017-04-21 2:21 ` kbuild test robot
2017-04-21 19:21 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-21 19:56 ` Verma, Vishal L
2017-04-21 20:16 ` Luck, Tony
2017-04-21 20:19 ` Dan Williams
2017-04-21 20:27 ` Luck, Tony
2017-04-21 21:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-24 11:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/MCE: Export memory_error() Borislav Petkov
2017-04-25 21:07 ` Vishal Verma
2017-05-10 19:31 ` Verma, Vishal L
2017-05-10 20:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-10 20:06 ` Verma, Vishal L
2017-05-10 20:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-10 21:12 ` Verma, Vishal L
2017-05-10 21:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-10 22:03 ` Verma, Vishal L
2017-05-10 22:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-10 22:22 ` Verma, Vishal L
2017-05-17 12:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-05-17 18:58 ` Verma, Vishal L
2017-05-17 19:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-24 11:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/ras/mce_amd_inj: Preset MCE injection struct Borislav Petkov
2017-04-26 19:59 ` kbuild test robot
2017-04-21 20:35 ` [PATCH] acpi, nfit: fix the memory error check in nfit_handle_mce Vishal Verma
2017-04-21 20:50 ` Luck, Tony
2017-04-21 20:54 ` Vishal Verma [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170421205410.GD10645@omniknight.lm.intel.com \
--to=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).