From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v3] mtd: nand: add ooblayout for old hamming layout
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 14:03:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170502140300.33ac055d@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170502101900.5066-1-lynxis@fe80.eu>
+Brian
On Tue, 2 May 2017 12:19:00 +0200
Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu> wrote:
> The old 1-bit hamming layout requires ECC data to be placed at a
> fixed offset, and not necessarily at the end of the OOB area.
> Add this old layout back in order to fix legacy setups.
>
> Fixes: 41b207a70d3a ("mtd: nand: implement the default mtd_ooblayout_ops")
> CC: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu>
Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Brian, maybe you can consider taking this patch directly in
l2-mtd/master before preparing your PR to Linus (if you're happy with
the patch of course). Otherwise, I'll take it into my tree and send a
fixes PR after 4.12-rc1 is out.
> ---
Alexander, just for the record, you should put your changelog here.
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index b0524f8accb6..44c0faf84426 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -139,6 +139,74 @@ const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops nand_ooblayout_lp_ops = {
> };
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nand_ooblayout_lp_ops);
>
> +/*
> + * Support the old "large page" layout used for 1-bit Hamming ECC where ECC
> + * are placed at a fixed offset.
> + */
> +static int nand_ooblayout_ecc_lp_hamming(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
> + struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
> +{
> + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> + struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
> +
> + if (section)
> + return -ERANGE;
> +
> + switch (mtd->oobsize) {
> + case 64:
> + oobregion->offset = 40;
> + break;
> + case 128:
> + oobregion->offset = 80;
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + oobregion->length = ecc->total;
> + if (oobregion->offset + oobregion->length > mtd->oobsize)
> + return -ERANGE;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int nand_ooblayout_free_lp_hamming(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
> + struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
> +{
> + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> + struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
> + int ecc_offset = 0;
> +
> + if (section < 0 || section > 1)
> + return -ERANGE;
> +
> + switch (mtd->oobsize) {
> + case 64:
> + ecc_offset = 40;
> + break;
> + case 128:
> + ecc_offset = 80;
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (section == 0) {
> + oobregion->offset = 2;
> + oobregion->length = ecc_offset - 2;
> + } else {
> + oobregion->offset = ecc_offset + ecc->total;
> + oobregion->length = mtd->oobsize - oobregion->offset;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops nand_ooblayout_lp_hamming_ops = {
> + .ecc = nand_ooblayout_ecc_lp_hamming,
> + .free = nand_ooblayout_free_lp_hamming,
> +};
> +
> static int check_offs_len(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> {
> @@ -4653,7 +4721,7 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> break;
> case 64:
> case 128:
> - mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &nand_ooblayout_lp_ops);
> + mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &nand_ooblayout_lp_hamming_ops);
> break;
> default:
> WARN(1, "No oob scheme defined for oobsize %d\n",
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-02 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170502081323.3138-1-lynxis@fe80.eu>
2017-05-02 10:19 ` [PATCH][v3] mtd: nand: add ooblayout for old hamming layout Alexander Couzens
2017-05-02 12:03 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2017-05-03 1:57 ` Brian Norris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170502140300.33ac055d@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lynxis@fe80.eu \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).