From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>,
target-devel@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Andy Grover <agrover@redhat.com>,
David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/19] target: Fix data buffer size for VERIFY and WRITE AND VERIFY commands
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 11:42:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170505094250.GA6138@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170504225102.8931-7-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Hi Bart,
what do you think about the variant below instead which avoids
overloading the size variable?
---
>From 206696ec37cf4f6efe093964c2bdc96100de1f62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 11:40:38 +0200
Subject: target: fix and cleanup size calculation in sbc_parse_cdb
Calculate the data buffer size individually for each command instead of
trying to generalize it. This fixes the size calculation for VERIFY
and WRITE_VERIFY, while making the code a lot easier to understand.
Fixes: commit 0e2eb7d12eaa ("target: Fix VERIFY and WRITE VERIFY command parsing")
Reported-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c b/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
index 5807123214e5..0bd879b9ce38 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
@@ -899,12 +899,14 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
switch (cdb[0]) {
case READ_6:
sectors = transport_get_sectors_6(cdb);
+ size = sbc_get_size(cmd, sectors);
cmd->t_task_lba = transport_lba_21(cdb);
cmd->se_cmd_flags |= SCF_SCSI_DATA_CDB;
cmd->execute_cmd = sbc_execute_rw;
break;
case READ_10:
sectors = transport_get_sectors_10(cdb);
+ size = sbc_get_size(cmd, sectors);
cmd->t_task_lba = transport_lba_32(cdb);
if (sbc_check_dpofua(dev, cmd, cdb))
@@ -919,6 +921,7 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
break;
case READ_12:
sectors = transport_get_sectors_12(cdb);
+ size = sbc_get_size(cmd, sectors);
cmd->t_task_lba = transport_lba_32(cdb);
if (sbc_check_dpofua(dev, cmd, cdb))
@@ -933,6 +936,7 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
break;
case READ_16:
sectors = transport_get_sectors_16(cdb);
+ size = sbc_get_size(cmd, sectors);
cmd->t_task_lba = transport_lba_64(cdb);
if (sbc_check_dpofua(dev, cmd, cdb))
@@ -947,12 +951,14 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
break;
case WRITE_6:
sectors = transport_get_sectors_6(cdb);
+ size = sbc_get_size(cmd, sectors);
cmd->t_task_lba = transport_lba_21(cdb);
cmd->se_cmd_flags |= SCF_SCSI_DATA_CDB;
cmd->execute_cmd = sbc_execute_rw;
break;
case WRITE_10:
sectors = transport_get_sectors_10(cdb);
+ size = sbc_get_size(cmd, sectors);
cmd->t_task_lba = transport_lba_32(cdb);
if (sbc_check_dpofua(dev, cmd, cdb))
@@ -974,6 +980,7 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
goto check_lba;
case WRITE_12:
sectors = transport_get_sectors_12(cdb);
+ size = sbc_get_size(cmd, sectors);
cmd->t_task_lba = transport_lba_32(cdb);
if (sbc_check_dpofua(dev, cmd, cdb))
@@ -988,6 +995,7 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
break;
case WRITE_16:
sectors = transport_get_sectors_16(cdb);
+ size = sbc_get_size(cmd, sectors);
cmd->t_task_lba = transport_lba_64(cdb);
if (sbc_check_dpofua(dev, cmd, cdb))
@@ -1005,6 +1013,7 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
!(cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_BIDI))
return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD;
sectors = transport_get_sectors_10(cdb);
+ size = sbc_get_size(cmd, sectors);
if (sbc_check_dpofua(dev, cmd, cdb))
return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD;
@@ -1024,6 +1033,7 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
switch (service_action) {
case XDWRITEREAD_32:
sectors = transport_get_sectors_32(cdb);
+ size = sbc_get_size(cmd, sectors);
if (sbc_check_dpofua(dev, cmd, cdb))
return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD;
@@ -1116,7 +1126,13 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
sectors = transport_get_sectors_16(cdb);
cmd->t_task_lba = transport_lba_64(cdb);
}
+
+ /*
+ * XXX: why treat sectors / size check differently for
+ * the offload / non-offload cases?
+ */
if (ops->execute_sync_cache) {
+ size = sbc_get_size(cmd, sectors);
cmd->execute_cmd = ops->execute_sync_cache;
goto check_lba;
}
@@ -1205,9 +1221,6 @@ sbc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, struct sbc_ops *ops)
end_lba, cmd->t_task_lba, sectors);
return TCM_ADDRESS_OUT_OF_RANGE;
}
-
- if (!(cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_COMPARE_AND_WRITE))
- size = sbc_get_size(cmd, sectors);
}
return target_cmd_size_check(cmd, size);
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-05 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170504225102.8931-1-bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
2017-05-04 22:50 ` [PATCH 03/19] target: Avoid that aborting a command sporadically hangs Bart Van Assche
2017-05-05 6:12 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-05-05 8:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-05 15:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-11 0:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-07 22:20 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-05-08 21:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-10 4:48 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-05-04 22:50 ` [PATCH 04/19] target/fileio: Avoid that zero-length READ and WRITE commands hang Bart Van Assche
2017-05-05 6:14 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-05-05 8:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-07 22:28 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-05-04 22:50 ` [PATCH 05/19] target: Allocate sg-list correctly Bart Van Assche
2017-05-05 6:15 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-05-05 9:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-05 15:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-07 22:45 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-05-08 17:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-10 4:03 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-05-10 6:12 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-05-10 20:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-11 5:28 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-05-04 22:50 ` [PATCH 06/19] target: Fix data buffer size for VERIFY and WRITE AND VERIFY commands Bart Van Assche
2017-05-05 9:42 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-05-05 15:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-07 22:49 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-05-08 18:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-10 4:28 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-05-10 15:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-11 5:09 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-05-04 22:51 ` [PATCH 17/19] target/iscsi: Simplify timer manipulation code Bart Van Assche
2017-05-05 11:24 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170505094250.GA6138@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=agrover@redhat.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=ddiss@suse.de \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).