public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: remove disk after hw queue is started
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 09:10:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170509011025.GA13210@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170508172511.GA1750@localhost.localdomain>

Hi Keith,

Thanks for looking at this issue!

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 01:25:12PM -0400, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 12:15:25AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > This patch looks working, but seems any 'goto out' in this function
> > may have rick to cause the same race too.
> 
> The goto was really intended for handling totally broken contronllers,
> which isn't the case if someone requested to remove the pci device while
> we're initializing it. Point taken, though, let me run a few tests and
> see if there's a better way to handle this condition.

The thing is that remove can happen any time, either from hotplug or
unbinding driver or 'echo 1 > $PCI_PATH/remove'. At the same time,
the reset can be ongoing.

Also looks the hang in del_gendisk() is fixed by this change, but I
just found a new issue which is triggered after the NVMe PCI device is rescaned
again after last remove.

[  504.135554] VFS: Dirty inode writeback failed for block device nvme0n1p1 (err=-5).

> 
> > Another solution I thought of is to kill queues earlier, what do you
> > think about the following patch?
> 
> That should get it unstuck, but it will error all the IO that fsync_bdev
> would probably rather complete successfully.

nvme_dev_disable(false) has been completed already before killing queues in
nvme_remove_dead_ctrl(), so both hw queue is stopped and nvmeq->cq_vector is
set as -1 in nvme_suspend_queue(). That means no new I/O(include IO in
fsync_bdev) can be submitted successfully any more, so looks it is reasonable
to kill queue in nvme_remove_dead_ctrl().

> 
> Question though, why doesn't the remove_work's nvme_kill_queues in
> its current place allow forward progress already?

That is because .remove_work may not be run before del_gendisk() is
started even though the .reset_work is flushed, and we can't flush
.remove_work simply here.

Thanks,
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-09  1:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-08 11:24 [PATCH] nvme: remove disk after hw queue is started Ming Lei
2017-05-08 12:46 ` Ming Lei
2017-05-08 15:07   ` Keith Busch
2017-05-08 15:11     ` Keith Busch
2017-05-08 16:15       ` Ming Lei
2017-05-08 17:25         ` Keith Busch
2017-05-09  1:10           ` Ming Lei [this message]
2017-05-09  3:26             ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170509011025.GA13210@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox