From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:44560 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752339AbdEWUGV (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2017 16:06:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 22:06:07 +0200 From: Greg KH To: "Marciniszyn, Mike" Cc: "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "stable-commits@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] IB/hfi1: Protect the global dev_cntr_names and port_cntr_names Message-ID: <20170523200607.GA4896@kroah.com> References: <20170523194407.28059.59929.stgit@phlsvslse11.ph.intel.com> <20170523195533.GA17694@kroah.com> <32E1700B9017364D9B60AED9960492BC342FD4B2@fmsmsx120.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <32E1700B9017364D9B60AED9960492BC342FD4B2@fmsmsx120.amr.corp.intel.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 07:59:21PM +0000, Marciniszyn, Mike wrote: > > > Cc: stable # v4.10 > > > > Why resend this??? > > There are two patches, one for 4.10 and one for 4.11. > > Each of the v2's should have had a different version on the stable cc line in the signoff block. But I already emailed you saying, 4.10 is end-of-life, no one is doing anything with it, so why resend it? greg k-h