From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from outbound-smtp09.blacknight.com ([46.22.139.14]:47945 "EHLO outbound-smtp09.blacknight.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753512AbdGJPcN (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:32:13 -0400 Received: from mail.blacknight.com (pemlinmail04.blacknight.ie [81.17.254.17]) by outbound-smtp09.blacknight.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 437601C1B9B for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:32:02 +0100 (IST) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:32:01 +0100 From: Mel Gorman To: Greg KH Cc: Linux-Stable Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Performance-related backports for 4.12 Message-ID: <20170710153201.cdozpt36i6emp67d@techsingularity.net> References: <20170710123752.7563-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net> <20170710152531.GA13980@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170710152531.GA13980@kroah.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:25:31PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:37:43PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > The 4.12 release was large but there was a number of important > > performance-related patches that are relatively low-hanging fruit. There > > are other patches but data is still being collected. This is a collection > > that have only been tested on 4.12 and while they may merge against older > > kernels, I have no data on how it behaves and cannot guarantee it's a good > > idea so I don't recommend it. > > > > > > Thanks for these, I've queued them all up now. > Thanks. > I couldn't resist patch 1 for the older kernels as well, can't hurt[1] :) > Ah, that one should be fine :D -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs