From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Michael Wang <yun.wang@profitbricks.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [ Linux 4.4 stable ] missing 'printk: set may_schedule for some of console_trylock() callers'
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 06:57:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170725135745.GC20317@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8cfee169-00eb-4b08-3440-ccf654a056aa@profitbricks.com>
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:28:16AM +0200, Michael Wang wrote:
> Hi, greg k-h
>
> During our testing with 4.4.73 we got soft lockup like:
>
> NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 23s! [systemd-udevd:856]
> ...
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8109d139>] vprintk_emit+0x319/0x4a0
> [<ffffffff8112182d>] printk_emit+0x33/0x3b
> [<ffffffff812f9e9c>] ? simple_strtoull+0x2c/0x50
> [<ffffffff8109d39a>] devkmsg_write+0xaa/0x100
> [<ffffffff8109d2f0>] ? vprintk+0x30/0x30
> [<ffffffff811915f2>] do_readv_writev+0x1c2/0x270
> [<ffffffff8117899d>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x7d/0x1a0
> [<ffffffff81191729>] vfs_writev+0x39/0x50
> [<ffffffff8119240a>] SyS_writev+0x4a/0xd0
> [<ffffffff8158bc97>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6a
>
> Currently in 4.4 the console_unlock() called by vprintk_emit() is with
> preemption disabled, so the cond_resched is not working, and soft lockup
> appear if it take too much time on writing data into every console.
>
> We found the upstream patch:
> commit 6b97a20d3a79 printk: set may_schedule for some of console_trylock() callers
>
> which should have addressed this issue, but not included in the latest 4.4.78 stable
> yet, is there any plan on backport it in future?
That commit was in the 4.6 kernel release, so odds are, it's not on a
list of patches to backport any time soon :)
But, you can ask for it to be included, if you cc: the stable@vger list,
like I did here, and add the authors of the patch to the cc: asking if
they have any objection for it being backported (also added here...)
Sergey, any objection for me backporting this?
thanks,
greg k-h
next parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-25 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <8cfee169-00eb-4b08-3440-ccf654a056aa@profitbricks.com>
2017-07-25 13:57 ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-07-25 16:33 ` [ Linux 4.4 stable ] missing 'printk: set may_schedule for some of console_trylock() callers' Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-07-26 8:44 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170725135745.GC20317@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yun.wang@profitbricks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).