From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:33033 "EHLO
        out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751963AbdHCWlw (ORCPT
        <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 3 Aug 2017 18:41:52 -0400
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 15:41:49 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@intel.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, e1000-rdma@lists.sourceforge.net,
        chien.tin.tung@intel.com, shiraz.saleem@intel.com,
        "# v4 . 2-v4 . 9" <stable@vger.kernel.org>, security@kernel.org,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
        Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>,
        Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/uverbs: Fix the check for port number
Message-ID: <20170803224149.GF2396@kroah.com>
References: <1501085686-12916-1-git-send-email-mustafa.ismail@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1501085686-12916-1-git-send-email-mustafa.ismail@intel.com>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:14:46AM -0500, Mustafa Ismail wrote:
> The port number is only valid if IB_QP_PORT is set in the mask.
> So only check port number if it is valid to prevent modify_qp
> from failing due to an invalid port number.
> 
> Fixes: 5ecce4c9b17b("Check port number supplied by user verbs cmds")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.2-v4.9
> Cc: <security@kernel.org>
> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
> Cc: Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@intel.com>
> 
> Upstream commit 5a7a88f1b488("Fix the check for port number")
> Modified from upstream commit: helper function rdma_is_port_valid does not
> exist in these kernel versions.

Note, you sent this 3 times for some reason, why?

Also, it was hard to figure out what to do with it, I think it was ment
for me to apply to the 4.4 and 4.9-stable trees, right?  If so, I've
done that, if not, please let me know.

thanks,

greg k-h