Subject: [PATCH 15/25] ipv6: repair fib6 tree in failure case

From: Wei Wang <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 17:14:49 -0700

[ Upstream commit 348a4002729ccab8b888b38cbc099efa2f2a2036 ]

In fib6_add(), it is possible that fib6_add_1() picks an intermediate
node and sets the node's fn->leaf to NULL in order to add this new
route. However, if fib6_add_rt2node() fails to add the new
route for some reason, fn->leaf will be left as NULL and could
potentially cause crash when fn->leaf is accessed in fib6_locate().
This patch makes sure fib6_repair_tree() is called to properly repair
fn->leaf in the above failure case.

Here is the syzkaller reported general protection fault in fib6_locate:
kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled
kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access
general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 40937 Comm: syz-executor3 Not tainted
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
task: ffff8801d7d64100 ti: ffff8801d01a0000 task.ti: ffff8801d01a0000
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff82a3e0e1>]  [<ffffffff82a3e0e1>] __ipv6_prefix_equal64_half include/net/ipv6.h:475 [inline]
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff82a3e0e1>]  [<ffffffff82a3e0e1>] ipv6_prefix_equal include/net/ipv6.h:492 [inline]
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff82a3e0e1>]  [<ffffffff82a3e0e1>] fib6_locate_1 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1210 [inline]
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff82a3e0e1>]  [<ffffffff82a3e0e1>] fib6_locate+0x281/0x3c0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1233
RSP: 0018:ffff8801d01a36a8  EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000020 RBX: ffff8801bc790e00 RCX: ffffc90002983000
RDX: 0000000000001219 RSI: ffff8801d01a37a0 RDI: 0000000000000100
RBP: ffff8801d01a36f0 R08: 00000000000000ff R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffff8801d01a37a0 R15: 0000000000000000
FS:  00007f6afd68c700(0000) GS:ffff8801db400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00000000004c6340 CR3: 00000000ba41f000 CR4: 00000000001426f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Stack:
 ffff8801d01a37a8 ffff8801d01a3780 ffffed003a0346f5 0000000c82a23ea0
 ffff8800b7bd7700 ffff8801d01a3780 ffff8800b6a1c940 ffffffff82a23ea0
 ffff8801d01a3920 ffff8801d01a3748 ffffffff82a223d6 ffff8801d7d64988
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff82a223d6>] ip6_route_del+0x106/0x570 net/ipv6/route.c:2109
 [<ffffffff82a23f9d>] inet6_rtm_delroute+0xfd/0x100 net/ipv6/route.c:3075
 [<ffffffff82621359>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x549/0x7a0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3450
 [<ffffffff8274c1d1>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x141/0x370 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2281
 [<ffffffff82613ddf>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x2f/0x40 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3456
 [<ffffffff8274ad38>] netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1206 [inline]
 [<ffffffff8274ad38>] netlink_unicast+0x518/0x750 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1232
 [<ffffffff8274b83e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x8ce/0xc30 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1778
 [<ffffffff82564aff>] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:609 [inline]
 [<ffffffff82564aff>] sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x110 net/socket.c:619
 [<ffffffff82564d62>] sock_write_iter+0x222/0x3a0 net/socket.c:834
 [<ffffffff8178523d>] new_sync_write+0x1dd/0x2b0 fs/read_write.c:478
 [<ffffffff817853f4>] __vfs_write+0xe4/0x110 fs/read_write.c:491
 [<ffffffff81786c38>] vfs_write+0x178/0x4b0 fs/read_write.c:538
 [<ffffffff817892a9>] SYSC_write fs/read_write.c:585 [inline]
 [<ffffffff817892a9>] SyS_write+0xd9/0x1b0 fs/read_write.c:577
 [<ffffffff82c71e32>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x17

Note: there is no "Fixes" tag as this seems to be a bug introduced
very early.

Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <[email-masked]>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <[email-masked]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email-masked]>
---
 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
index 1421a846ad36..ff389591a340 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
@@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ int fib6_add(struct fib6_node *root, struct rt6_info *rt,
 			/* Create subtree root node */
 			sfn = node_alloc();
 			if (!sfn)
-				goto st_failure;
+				goto failure;
 
 			sfn->leaf = info->nl_net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry;
 			atomic_inc(&info->nl_net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry->rt6i_ref);
@@ -1017,12 +1017,12 @@ int fib6_add(struct fib6_node *root, struct rt6_info *rt,
 
 			if (IS_ERR(sn)) {
 				/* If it is failed, discard just allocated
-				   root, and then (in st_failure) stale node
+				   root, and then (in failure) stale node
 				   in main tree.
 				 */
 				node_free(sfn);
 				err = PTR_ERR(sn);
-				goto st_failure;
+				goto failure;
 			}
 
 			/* Now link new subtree to main tree */
@@ -1036,7 +1036,7 @@ int fib6_add(struct fib6_node *root, struct rt6_info *rt,
 
 			if (IS_ERR(sn)) {
 				err = PTR_ERR(sn);
-				goto st_failure;
+				goto failure;
 			}
 		}
 
@@ -1078,22 +1078,22 @@ int fib6_add(struct fib6_node *root, struct rt6_info *rt,
 			atomic_inc(&pn->leaf->rt6i_ref);
 		}
 #endif
-		if (!(rt->dst.flags & DST_NOCACHE))
-			dst_free(&rt->dst);
+		goto failure;
 	}
 	return err;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES
-	/* Subtree creation failed, probably main tree node
-	   is orphan. If it is, shoot it.
+failure:
+	/* fn->leaf could be NULL if fn is an intermediate node and we
+	 * failed to add the new route to it in both subtree creation
+	 * failure and fib6_add_rt2node() failure case.
+	 * In both cases, fib6_repair_tree() should be called to fix
+	 * fn->leaf.
 	 */
-st_failure:
 	if (fn && !(fn->fn_flags & (RTN_RTINFO|RTN_ROOT)))
 		fib6_repair_tree(info->nl_net, fn);
 	if (!(rt->dst.flags & DST_NOCACHE))
 		dst_free(&rt->dst);
 	return err;
-#endif
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.13.5