From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Megha Dey <megha.dey@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: x86/sha1 : Fix reads beyond the number of blocks passed
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 08:06:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170831060635.GD7325@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170831060359.GC7325@kroah.com>
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 08:03:59AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:08:31AM -0700, Megha Dey wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 17:47 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 05:41:03PM -0700, Megha Dey wrote:
> > > > It was reported that the sha1 AVX2 function(sha1_transform_avx2) is
> > > > reading ahead beyond its intended data, and causing a crash if the next
> > > > block is beyond page boundary:
> > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-crypto-vger&m=149373371023377
> > > >
> > > > This patch makes sure that there is no overflow for any buffer length.
> > > >
> > > > It passes the tests written by Jan Stancek that revealed this problem:
> > > > https://github.com/jstancek/sha1-avx2-crash
> > > >
> > > > This patch fixes reads beyond the number of blocks in the same way it
> > > > was done in commit 8861249c740fc4af9ddc5aee321eafefb960d7c6
> > > > ("crypto: x86/sha1 : Fix reads beyond the number of blocks passed").
> > >
> > > So all you really want is that specific commit added to the stable
> > > kernels? If so, what kernel tree(s)?
> >
> > Hi Greg,
> > The commit 8861249c740fc4af9ddc5aee321eafefb960d7c6 present in the
> > mainline kernel does not apply cleanly to the stable kernel tree. Hence,
> > I have submitted this patch with some minor changes for the stable tree.
> >
> > I am not sure what you mean by which kernel trees.
>
> There are lots of stable kernel trees being maintained at the moment,
> see:
> https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html
>
> I was asking if any of those are applicable for this patch as well.
Even more confusing, commit 8861249c740fc4af9ddc5aee321eafefb960d7c6 is
already in the stable kernel releases. It showed up in 4.4.84, 4.9.45,
and 4.12.9. You should have gotten notifications about all of these.
So I don't really understand what needs to be done here.
totally confused,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-31 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-23 0:41 [PATCH] crypto: x86/sha1 : Fix reads beyond the number of blocks passed Megha Dey
2017-08-23 0:47 ` Greg KH
2017-08-29 17:08 ` Megha Dey
2017-08-31 6:03 ` Greg KH
2017-08-31 6:06 ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-08-31 17:35 ` Megha Dey
2017-09-04 9:34 ` Greg KH
2017-09-18 6:42 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170831060635.GD7325@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=megha.dey@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox